Being a Big Mouth with Friends
The War on Women: Foot First

The Education Philosophy of 0=50

“What does doing 0 work but getting a grade of 50 teach a child?” No, this is not a rhetorical question, neither is it a hypothetical one. It is a question that teachers across the country seem to be dealing with (well, maybe not across the country, but at least in Virginia and Colorado).

“Why would a student get a 50% on an assignment that he did not do?” is a better question. Or perhaps: “Why would a teacher be told/directed to give a student a 50% on an assignment that was assigned but which the student did not do?” From what I understand there are two main rationales.

One: not to damage the ego of a child because, you know, getting 0% for the 0% effort he put into his schoolwork would cause his self-confidence to plummet. This is as opposed to doing 100% of the work, and working hard at it, and getting a grade that makes him proud of the work he did—or at least aware that effort is rewarded, and that you learn and improve the more work you do. That, apparently, isn’t such a sound idea these days. Perhaps it is too much of a retro idea and education theorists and philosophers are all about continually re-inventing the education wheel.

Two: too many Ds and Fs look bad for a teacher and, more importantly, a school. What would the pie charts and the bar graphs and statistics look like if a school has too many students at the bottom end of the grade alphabet? No, that’s not good because then schools would have to worry about being labeled low performing or not improving student performance enough, which is worse, apparently, than actually figuring out why a student is not doing his work and working with him—so grade inflation is the way to prevent that. (I love the word “performance,” which is as appropriate as “are you still working” when you are eating in a restaurant. Shouldn’t the word be knowledge or understanding, you know, something related to the learning process; and in relation to the restaurant, shouldn’t it be “eating,” as in are you still eating that apple pie?)

“No Child Left Behind” and “Race to the Top,” in their efforts to raise the educational level of all students, sure have resulted in some skewed practices. I understand and fully support believing in every single child in this country and giving him or her the best education possible, but encouraging kids to be lazy seems to be faulty—or lazy—logic to me.  

I have taught high school freshmen who are stunned when they receive 0s. Seriously, they are upset and confused that I don’t give them credit just because they’re such wonderful and cute kids. Someone please tell me what real-world lesson this emulates that wouldn’t result in someone going to jail—or having resulted in having some really great coupons?

Why should 14-year-olds first be learning that work=grade or that there are consequences for their actions/inactions? Wouldn’t it be better, for all of us now and into the future, if we taught kids that they are as accountable for their grades as we the educators and the parents and the administrators and society are? 




I don't understand that rationale at all. If a student doesn't do an assignment, they get a zero. What could be more simple than that? My job is performance based. I turn in my completed work; I get paid. Simple.

How is rewarding children with points they didn't earn supposed to help them learn to get along in the real world?


There is no rationale except people with no clue what to do to help kids be reached. There are lots of policies that can be explained and an understanding can be found, even if only vaguely, but this--nothing. If it comes to that (and it very well might from some indications) I am definitely not going to stay put. There is just no way that I could do that.


I have friends who are teachers and from what I know, teachers often have to conform to the standard set by the school. Usually, it is because of reason Two: "too many Ds and Fs look bad for a teacher and, more importantly, a school".....I think to a certain extent, parents are also responsible. They all want their kids to go to a 'good' school. So obviously, the school itself doesn't want to look too bad in the eyes of the parents. It is sort of like a negative never ending cycle.

Laura of Rebellious Thoughts of a Woman

Tracy, thanks for reading and commenting. To a great extent, if parents were more involved in their students' education, then there would be fewer Ds and Fs to have to deal with. So often I call parents to let them know how their child is doing and they are clueless, but still there is no change. It's not enough for teachers to try to motivate kids--it must come from home as well.

And the parents who are worrying about their kids getting into good schools, I see them pushing their own kids and for their own kids more than I see them worrying so much about anyone else.

english bill of rights

If a teacher fails a student, the blame, primarily is on her. It is because she is responsible for that student. The things she does reflect in the student's grades. Meaning if student fails, the teacher didn't teach the student properly. That's why it is really hard to be a teacher.

Laura of Rebellious Thoughts of a Woman

English Bill of Rights, I absolutely disagree. There are some students that regardless of how much you work with them fail because they don't do the work. Some students have undiagnosed learning difficulties and some students have a hard time with the language, or even a really rough time dealing with life and the things it has thrown at them. There are so many variables. But they don't stop a teacher from trying. At some point the student (and his/her parents) needs to be responsible for his/her learning.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)